These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Anatomical position of the vomeronasal organ in postnatal humans.
    Author: Smith TD, Buttery TA, Bhatnagar KP, Burrows AM, Mooney MP, Siegel MI.
    Journal: Ann Anat; 2001 Sep; 183(5):475-9. PubMed ID: 11677814.
    Abstract:
    In the last decade or so, there has been a renewed interest in the adult human vomeronasal organ (VNO). Studies have yielded sometimes disparate findings about the microscopic structure of the organ and its supporting tissues. Such varied descriptions may be due to examination of different regions of the VNO, individual variation of VNOs among humans, or the presence of multiple, non-homologous structures that bear false resemblance to the human VNO. A histological description of the spatial relationship of the human VNO to other nasal septal elements is needed to ensure that all investigators are examining the same regions and homologous structures. Histologically sectioned nasal septa from, 22 human cadavers (1 child, 21 adults) were examined grossly and by light microscopy for the VNO. Using histological sections, the position of the VNO relative to other structures was estimated. Sections containing the VNO were retrospectively compared to scaled photographic slides of the unsectioned septa to identify surface landmarks. Human VNOs varied in anteroposterior and superoinferior position relative to the anterior nasal spine and the nasal cavity floor. In the absence of a visible duct opening, the only reliable surface marker, no consistent surface markings were noted for precise location. VNOs were frequently found superior to swellings associated with the paraseptal and/or septal cartilages. Such findings demonstrate that the human VNO is positionally variable, which may have contributed to previous conflicting findings on presence versus absence. Furthermore, our findings support recent suggestions that the VNO may have been misidentified by some investigators, and that its opening can be easily confused with other structures.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]