These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Burr-hole versus twist-drill drainage for the evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma: a comparison of clinical results.
    Author: Williams GR, Baskaya MK, Menendez J, Polin R, Willis B, Nanda A.
    Journal: J Clin Neurosci; 2001 Nov; 8(6):551-4. PubMed ID: 11683603.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Most neurosurgeons remove clinically symptomatic subdural haematomata, but the techniques they choose remain controversial. METHOD: The results from sixty-two patients diagnosed with chronic subdural haematoma were evaluated for technique, postoperative computerized tomography (CT) scan results, and complications. RESULTS: Eleven patients had haematomata evacuated using twist-drill plus drain, 37 patients had haematomata evacuated with burr-hole only, and 14 patients were evacuated with burr-hole plus drain. Of the patients who underwent twist-drill and closed system drainage (CSD), 43% had smaller lesions on CT follow-up scans, as compared with 74% of those who underwent the burr-hole only procedure, and 65% with burr-holes with drains. Clinical outcome results showed that 64% of twist-drill and CSD patients deteriorated as compared with 16% of those with burr-hole only and 7% with burr-holes and CSDs. Sixty-four per cent of twist-drill patients required repeat evacuations as compared with 11% of those with burr-holes only, and 7% with burr-holes plus drains. CONCLUSION: The results at our institution indicate that burr-hole evacuation for chronic subdural haematoma is superior to twist-drill evacuation with respect to clinical outcomes and complications.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]