These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Hemodynamic effects of chest closure in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Author: Adsumelli RS, Shapiro JR, Shah PM, Martella AT, Afifi AY, Risher WB, Hicks GL. Journal: J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2001 Oct; 15(5):589-92. PubMed ID: 11688000. Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate hemodynamic effects of sternal retractor removal and sternal closure after cardiopulmonary bypass and to correlate these changes with preoperative and intraoperative variables. DESIGN: Prospective. SETTING: University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty adults undergoing cardiac surgery. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Arterial, pulmonary artery, and transesophageal echocardiography measurements were obtained immediately before and 1 minute after removal of the sternal retractor and immediately before and 1 minute after sternal closure. Retractor removal caused a significant decrease in cardiac index by 5.6% (p < 0.01), stroke volume index by 4.0% (p < 0.05), and mean pulmonary artery pressure by 4.8% (p < 0.001). Sternal closure caused a significant decrease in cardiac index by 7.7%, stroke volume index by 10.2%, and left ventricular end-diastolic area by 9.2% (p < 0.001) There were significant increases in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and systemic vascular resistance by 9.1% and 10.8% (p < 0.01). There was no significant change in the ejection fraction area. The magnitude of decrease in stroke volume index with sternal closure correlated positively with end-diastolic area immediately before the closure. CONCLUSION: Chest closure is associated with significant hemodynamic changes and a change in the ventricular transmural pressure-volume relationship. Patients with lower preload immediately before closure are more vulnerable to a decrease in cardiac index. Based on the results of this study, volume appears to be the appropriate preventive and treatment option to limit the impact of chest closure.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]