These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Ankle to brachial pressure index in normal subjects and trained cyclists with exercise-induced leg pain.
    Author: Taylor AJ, George KP.
    Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2001 Nov; 33(11):1862-7. PubMed ID: 11689736.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: This study compared ankle to brachial pressure indices (ABPI) before and after maximal exercise in three groups in order to investigate maximal exercise testing and ABPI as a useful procedure for the differential diagnosis of exercise-induced leg pain (EILP) in athletes. METHODS: ABPI measurements were taken before and after cycle ergometer exercise to volitional exhaustion or reproduction of symptoms in three groups: 1) untrained individuals (N = 10, 3 female, 7 male; age 35 +/- 5 yr (mean +/- SD)); 2) trained cyclists (N = 10, 3 female, 7 male; age, 30 +/- 5 yr); and 3) symptomatic group of trained cyclists, complaining of EILP (N = 12, 2 female, 10 male; age, 35 +/- 9 yr). RESULTS: Resting blood pressure indices were similar in all groups. ABPI were reduced (P < 0.05) in all groups after exercise. No differences between left and right legs were noted in the elite and untrained groups; however, a significant difference (P < 0.05) was noted between the nonsymptomatic (0.79 +/- 0.10) and symptomatic (0.61 +/- 0.20) legs in the subjects with EILP. Despite these group results, only three subjects in the symptomatic group met the published criteria (index of < 0.5) for endofibrosis of the external iliac artery. All positive ABPI tests were subsequently confirmed via arteriogram. CONCLUSION: Maximal exercise testing combined with ABPI measurement is a simple noninvasive procedure that may be useful for the examination of EILP. The results of this study suggest that, in cases with unilateral symptoms, a between-leg ABPI difference of 0.18 (at the first minute of recovery) may be considered as a useful additional diagnostic criterion.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]