These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of air and ground transport of cardiac patients.
    Author: Berns KS, Hankins DG, Zietlow SP.
    Journal: Air Med J; 2001; 20(6):33-6. PubMed ID: 11692138.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To investigate the outcome of cardiac patients transported by helicopter versus ground ambulance SETTING: A hospital-based helicopter program in southeastern Minnesota METHODS: Retrospective chart review assessing an 18-month period (January 1998 to June 1999). Charts were reviewed for type of cardiac diagnosis, level of pain, treatments en route, time to intervention, and length of stay (LOS). Two-hundred-sixty-six cardiac patients came by helicopter. Of the 86 turndowns, 50 came by ground ambulance; 28 records were recovered in this group. These patients composed the comparison ground group. RESULTS: Prehospital time was less for patients transported by air than ground transports (P <.001). The amount of time from the call for transport until arrival at our hospital was less for helicopter transports (P =.002). Air transports had more patients with reduced chest pain on arrival. Difference in CCU LOS was not significant (P =.94). Air patients spent an average of 2 fewer days in the hospital than did ground patients (P =.036). DISCUSSION: Helicopter transport benefits the cardiac patient with decreased chest pain as a result of more treatments en route; decreased time from the call until arrival, resulting in decreased time to intervention; and shorter prehospital time and hospital stays. CONCLUSION: All of these improved variables relate to salvaged cardiac muscle.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]