These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparative steady-state bioavailability of sustained-release theophylline preparations: Theo-Dur, Uni-Dur and Xanthium.
    Author: Rojanasthien N, Kovjiriyapan K, Manorot M, Pothirat C.
    Journal: Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol; 2001 Jun; 19(2):69-78. PubMed ID: 11699723.
    Abstract:
    Steady-state bioavailability of sustained-release theophylline (SRT); Theo-Dur, Uni-Dur and Xanthium were compared in 10 healthy males with theophylline clearance ranged from 0.3 - 0.8 ml/min/kg. Each of 400-mg SRT was administered once daily before breakfast for 7 consecutive days, one-week washout period in a crossover fashion. Serial blood samples were collected over 24 hours on days 6 and 7. Serum theophylline concentrations were determined by fluorescence polarized immunoassay. We found that the oral bloavailability relative to Franol (%F [90% CI]) of Theo-Dur, Uni-Dur and Xanthium were 97 (93-106), 85 (79-96) and 77 (72-87), respectively. Average bioequivalence revealed that the Css(min) (microg/ml) of Uni-Dur (5.07) was higher than Theo-Dur (4.29), and Xanthiume (4.18), while the Css(max) and Css(av) (microg/ml) of Theo-Dur (11.02, 7.87) were statistically higher than Uni-Dur (8.51, 6.91) and Xanthium (7.65, 6.27). The extent of absorption assessed by AUCss(0.24) of Theo-Dur was significantly greater than Uni-Dur and Xanthium. However, fluctuation index (% FI) of Theo-Dur (232) was twofold higher than Uni-Dur (137) and Xanthium (113). The median Tss(max) of Uni-Dur was 12 hours which was significantly longer than Xanthium (7 hours) and Theo-Dur (8 hours). There were no statistically significant differences between Uni-Dur and Xanthium regarding bioavailability, Css(max), Css(av) as well as % FI. Moreover, 400 mg OD of Uni-Dur and Xanthium are suitable for subjects with a theophylline clearance of 0.3-0.55 ml/min/kg while 400 mg OD Theo-Dur can be used in subjects with slower clearance rates of 0.3-0.39 ml/min/kg. Subjects with rapid theophylline clearance rates of 0.65-0.8 ml/min/kg required a higher dose of theophylline and twice-daily dosing was more appropriate.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]