These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Cochlear outer-hair-cell efferents and complex-sound-induced hearing loss: protective and opposing effects.
    Author: Rajan R.
    Journal: J Neurophysiol; 2001 Dec; 86(6):3073-6. PubMed ID: 11731564.
    Abstract:
    Centrifugal crossed and uncrossed medial olivocochlear systems (CMOCS and UMOCS) terminate on cochlear outer hair cells (OHCs) and exercise effects through a nicotinic cholinergic receptor. Hence their cochlear effects have not been differentiated. Recent work on protection from loud-sound-induced temporary threshold shifts (TTSs) in hearing sensitivity suggest the two OHC efferent systems may act differently. This was tested, using traumatic complex sound, to determine if such sound could activate both MOCS components and then reveal whether they exerted different effects on TTSs to such stimuli. Traumatic noise bands activated crossed and uncrossed MOCS efferents. Two different CMOCS effects were observed. For frequencies in the noise (within-band frequencies), it protected hearing sensitivity as expected. Novel findings were that at frequencies higher than the noise band range (high-side frequencies), it acted to worsen hearing sensitivity and that this was opposed by a UMOCS effect generally targeted to these frequency regions. It is proposed that the two crossed MOCS actions are extensions of a contrast-enhancement action for low-level noise bands. It is also proposed that the UMOCS plays a state-restoration role to prevent an undesired CMOCS side-effect of exacerbation of high-side TTSs to high-level noise bands.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]