These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Is the formation of a bladder flap at cesarean necessary? A randomized trial.
    Author: Hohlagschwandtner M, Ruecklinger E, Husslein P, Joura EA.
    Journal: Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 98(6):1089-92. PubMed ID: 11755558.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of not forming a bladder flap at lower-segment cesarean delivery. METHODS: A total of 102 women who underwent cesarean delivery were prospectively randomized to one of two groups. In the study group (n = 53), a cesarean was performed without formation of a bladder flap. In the control group (n = 49), cesarean was performed with formation of a bladder flap before the uterine incision. RESULTS: There were differences of median skin incision-delivery interval (5 versus 7 minutes, P <.001), median total operating time (35 versus 40 minutes, P =.004), and median blood loss (Delta hemoglobin 0.5 versus 1 g/dL, P =.009) in favor of the study group. Postoperative microhematuria was reduced in the study group (21% versus 47%, P <.01). The median need for analgesics was reduced in the study group (75.0 mg diclofenac versus 150.0 mg, P <.001), and there was a lower percentage of patients receiving analgesics 2 or more days after cesarean in the study group (26.4% versus 55.1%, P =.006). There was no difference in bowel function. CONCLUSION: Omission of the bladder flap provides short-term advantages such as reduction of operating time and incision-delivery interval, reduced blood loss, and need for analgesics. Long-term effects remain to be evaluated.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]