These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Biofilters--the influence of different filter materials and different operating conditions on the reduction efficiency.
    Author: Hartung E, Martinec M, Jungbluth T.
    Journal: Water Sci Technol; 2001; 44(9):253-60. PubMed ID: 11762470.
    Abstract:
    A series of biofilter materials were tested for performance efficiency in treating ventilation air from pig sheds. Two different phases were conducted. In phase A five different biofilter materials were tested with the aim of selecting the best material regarding the odor reduction and over all efficiency. In conclusion of phase A, biochips, a new filter material, was selected due to its high average odor reduction (81%) in combination with a very low flow resistance (less than 30 Pa for filter volume loads of 600 m3 h(-1) m(-3)). In phase B, biochips and coconut fiber peat were tested under different operating conditions. Biofilters number 3 and 4 each with down-flow air supply could realize a higher average odor reduction than biofilter 5 with up-flow air supply. All three filter materials had the same moisture, however the two biofilters with down-flow air supply showed a more homogenous moisture distribution but they also used approximately three times more water than biofilter 5. Like in phase A the specific odor cleaning efficiency was mainly influenced by the specific odor loading rate and showed only slight differences between the five biofilters differing in bulk layer height (0.5 m and 1.0 m) and air supply mode. All in all the investigation showed that the efficiency of biofilters can be optimized by using an new filter material and a appropiate operating mode.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]