These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Analysis of temporal changes of mammographic features: computer-aided classification of malignant and benign breast masses.
    Author: Hadjiiski L, Sahiner B, Chan HP, Petrick N, Helvie MA, Gurcan M.
    Journal: Med Phys; 2001 Nov; 28(11):2309-17. PubMed ID: 11764038.
    Abstract:
    A new classification scheme was developed to classify mammographic masses as malignant and benign by using interval change information. The masses on both the current and the prior mammograms were automatically segmented using an active contour method. From each mass, 20 run length statistics (RLS) texture features, 3 speculation features, and 12 morphological features were extracted. Additionally, 20 difference RLS features were obtained by subtracting the prior RLS features from the corresponding current RLS features. The feature space consisted of the current RLS features, the difference RLS features, the current and prior speculation features, and the current and prior mass sizes. Stepwise feature selection and linear discriminant analysis classification were used to select and merge the most useful features. A leave-one-case-out resampling scheme was used to train and test the classifier using 140 temporal image pairs (85 malignant, 55 benign) obtained from 57 biopsy-proven masses (33 malignant, 24 benign) in 56 patients. An average of 10 features were selected from the 56 training subsets: 4 difference RLS features, 4 RLS features, and 1 speculation feature from the current image, and 1 speculation feature from the prior, were most often chosen. The classifier achieved an average training Az of 0.92 and a test Az of 0.88. For comparison, a classifier was trained and tested using features extracted from the 120 current single images. This classifier achieved an average training Az of 0.90 and a test Az of 0.82. The information on the prior image significantly (p = 0.015) improved the accuracy for classification of the masses.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]