These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Result-oriented remuneration for hospital inpatient care].
    Author: Lüngen M, Lauterbach KW.
    Journal: Gesundheitswesen; 2002 Jan; 64(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 11791202.
    Abstract:
    Fee-for-benefit means the adjustment of the reimbursement at the quality of care. Both a bonus and a penalty are possible. It is suggested to measure innovative therapies with outcome parameters and give a bonus as an incentive for quality improvements. Standard therapies should be measured with process parameters and be sanctioned with a penalty when the standards are missed. To determine the extend of the bonus and the penalty, the variable costs of a hospital could be used as a reference. Therefore a penalty should not exceed approximately 25 % of the reimbursement. The costs for the introduction and administration of the fee-for-benefit reimbursement must be seen in the context of the necessary improvement of quality insurance in per-case reimbursement with DRG (Diagnosis-Related Groups) in Germany. Related to the incidence of preventable adverse events and the additional costs of poor-quality outcome evaluated from studies fee-for-benefit will be cost-effective by avoiding every sixth adverse event. German legislation allows fee-for-benefit only in small model projects or local integrated networks. It is recommended to allow an optional opening of negotiations between hospitals and sickness funds for fee-for-benefit elements. A pilot study should evaluate the incidence and cost of preventable adverse events in Germany.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]