These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: [Assessment of erythrocyte pyrimidine 5'-nucleotidase test for screening of occupational lead poisoning].
    Author: Lü L, Lin G, Wang Q.
    Journal: Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2000 Apr; 80(4):283-6. PubMed ID: 11798774.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To determine the diagnostic value of red cell P5'-N for detecting occupational lead poisoning. METHODS: Red cell pyrimidine 5;-nucleotidase, blood lead and urine lead levels, free erythrocyte protoporphyrin (FEP), zinc protoporphyrin (ZPP) and urine delta-aminolevulinic acid levels were determined in 157 lead exposed workers and 30 non-exposed healthy people. According to the golden standard; i.e. blood lead >/= 1.93 micromol/L and >/= 2.90 micromol/L, the diagnostic value of red cell P5'N and other indicators for detecting blood lead >/= 1.93 micromol/L and >/= 2.90 micromol/L was compared by receiver operative characteristic curve (ROC) software. After determining the optimal cut-points of the above indicators for detecting the blood lead >/= 1.93 micromol/L and >/= 2.90 micromol/L, the sensitivity of the parallel tests for detecting the blood lead >/= 1.93 micromol/L and >/= 2.90 micromol/L was calculated and compared by EPINFOR software. RESULTS: For detecting blood lead level >/= 1.93 micromol/L, the areas under ROC curve (AUC(ROC)) of P5'N was significantly larger than that of urinary lead and urinary delta-ALA (P < 0.05). The sensitivity of parallel tests with ZPP and P5'N was significantly larger than that of parallel tests with Upb and Udelta-ALA. For detecting blood lead level >/= 2.90 micromol/L, the areas under ROC curve (AUC(ROC))of P5'N was significantly larger than that of urinary lead, FEP and urinary delta-ALA (P < 0.05). The sensitivity of parallel tests with P5'N and ZPP was significantly larger than that of parallel tests with Upb and Udelta-ALA, and that of parallel tests with ZPP and FEP (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: For detecting blood lead >/= 1.93 micromol/L and >/= 2.90 micromol/L, red cell P5'N is more accurate. It is worth being applied in detecting occupational lead poisoning. For detecting blood lead >/= 1.93 micromol/L and >/= 2.90 micromol/L, the parallel tests with P5'N and ZPP are more accurate.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]