These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Plasma ascorbic acid: measurement, stability and clinical utility revisited.
    Author: Chung WY, Chung JK, Szeto YT, Tomlinson B, Benzie IF.
    Journal: Clin Biochem; 2001 Nov; 34(8):623-7. PubMed ID: 11849621.
    Abstract:
    AIMS: To compare plasma ascorbic acid results by the colorimetric FRASC (Ferric Reducing/Antioxidant and Ascorbic Acid) assay and a reference HPLC method; to re-examine plasma ascorbic acid stability, and anticoagulant effect. DESIGN AND METHODS: For method comparison, 31 plasma samples were tested by both methods. For stability, matching EDTA, heparin, citrate and fluoride/oxalate plasma, stored under different conditions of time and temperature, was measured. RESULTS: FRASC is an acceptable alternative to HPLC for plasma ascorbic acid: precision, limit of detection and recovery were similar, and results by the two methods were indistinguishable: mean (95% CI) difference:1.8 (-1.1-4.6; n = 31) micromol/L. Ascorbic acid was most stable in heparinized plasma. Marked loss (p < 0.05) in EDTA plasma occurred within 30 min of blood collection. CONCLUSIONS: FRASC offers a speedy and reliable alternative to HPLC for plasma ascorbic acid. Heparin is proposed as the anticoagulant of choice; loss of ascorbic acid is rapid in EDTA plasma ex vivo.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]