These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Ifosfamide and vinorelbine in advanced platinum-resistant ovarian cancer: excessive toxicity with a potentially active regimen.
    Author: González-Martín A, Crespo C, García-López JL, Pedraza M, Garrido P, Lastra E, Moyano A.
    Journal: Gynecol Oncol; 2002 Mar; 84(3):368-73. PubMed ID: 11855871.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the activity and toxicity of a vinorelbine and ifosfamide combination in platinum-resistant advanced ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were treated with ifosfamide (2 g/m(2)/day) infused over 1 h x 3 days (with mesna uroprotection) and vinorelbine (30 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 8. Treatment was repeated on a 21-day schedule. In order to avoid unacceptable toxicity in this subset of patients where the chemotherapy is mainly palliative, the Bryant and Day two-stage phase II trial design incorporating toxicity considerations was chosen. A cutoff point for the response rate (10%) and for severe toxicity (25%) was established for the first 14 patients. RESULTS: Between February 1997 and December 1998, 11 paclitaxel and platinum-resistant patients and 1 potentially platinum-sensitive patient were treated. Five patients (41%) experienced grade 3-4 central nervous toxicity requiring hospital admission. In accordance with the Bryant and Day design, the study was stopped early because greater than 25% of the first 14 patients developed grade 3-4 neurotoxicity. A retrospective review of clinical characteristics of these patients showed at least one well-known risk factor associated with ifosfamide central toxicity. Hematological toxicity was common, mainly grade 4 neutropenia, which was observed in all but 1 patient, usually of short duration, and there were 4 episodes of neutropenic fever. Ten patients were evaluated for response. Two complete responses and 1 partial response according to CA-125 criteria were observed. CONCLUSION: This combination may be active in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer but the high toxicity encountered, principally neurotoxicity in those with large central pelvic masses, means that further studies with this schedule may not be warranted.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]