These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Restraint and seclusion in psychiatry: review and prospects].
    Author: Palazzolo J, Favre P, Vittini P, Bougerol T.
    Journal: Encephale; 2001; 27(6):570-7. PubMed ID: 11865564.
    Abstract:
    In this article, the authors reviewed the literature published since 1965 concerning restraint and seclusion. They synthesized the contents of the articles reviewed using the categories of indications and contraindications; rates of seclusion and restraint as well as demographic, clinical, and environmental factors that affect these rates; effects on patients and staff; implementation; and training. The literature on restraint and seclusion supports the following: 1) Seclusion and restraint are basically efficacious in preventing injury and reducing agitation; 2) It is nearly impossible to operate a program for severely symptomatic individuals without some form of seclusion or physical or mechanical restraint; 3) Demographic and clinical factors have limited influence on rates of restraint and seclusion; 4) Training in prediction and prevention of violence, in self-defense, and in implementation of restraint and/or seclusion is valuable in reducing rates and untoward effects; 5) Studies comparing well-defined training programs have potential usefulness.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]