These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Candidate reference method for total thyroxine in human serum: use of isotope-dilution liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry with electrospray ionization.
    Author: Tai SS, Sniegoski LT, Welch MJ.
    Journal: Clin Chem; 2002; 48(4):637-42. PubMed ID: 11901062.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: There is a need for a critically evaluated reference method for thyroxine to provide an accuracy base to which routine methods can be traceable. We describe a candidate reference method involving isotope-dilution coupled with liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry. METHODS: An isotopically labeled internal standard, thyroxine-d(5), was added to serum, followed by equilibration, protein precipitation, and ethyl acetate and solid-phase extractions to prepare samples for liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry electrospray ionization (LC/MS-ESI) analysis. For separation, a Zorbax Eclipse XDB-C(18) column was used with a mobile phase consisting of 1 mL/L acetic acid in acetonitrile-water (32:68 by volume) for positive ions and a Zorbax Extend-C(18) column with a mobile phase consisting of 2 mL/L ammonium hydroxide in methanol-water (32:68 by volume) for negative ions. [M + H](+) ions at m/z 778 and 783 for thyroxine and its labeled internal standard were monitored for positive ions and [M - H](-) ions at m/z 776 and 781 for negative ions. Samples of frozen serum pools were prepared and measured in three separate sets. RESULTS: Within-set CVs were 0.2-1.0%. The correlation coefficients of all linear regression lines (measured intensity ratios vs mass ratios) were 0.999-1.000. Positive- and negative-ion measurements agreed with a mean difference of 0.45% at three concentrations (50, 110, and 168 microg/L). The detection limits (at a signal-to-noise ratio of approximately 3 to 5) were 30 and 20 pg for positive and negative ions, respectively. The results from the LC/MS-ESI method were within 1 SD of the composite means from many routine clinical methods, although it appears that the clinical method means may be biased high by 4-5 microg/L across the concentrations. Some routine clinical methods may be biased by up to 20% at low concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: This well-characterized LC/MS-ESI method for total serum thyroxine with a theoretically sound approach, demonstrated good accuracy and precision, and low susceptibility to interferences qualifies as a candidate reference method. Use of this reference method as an accuracy base may reduce the apparent biases in routine methods along with the high interlaboratory imprecision.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]