These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Pharmacodynamic studies on the angiotensin II type 1 antagonists irbesartan and candesartan based on angiotensin II dose response in humans.
    Author: Belz GG, Butzer R, Kober S, Mutschler E.
    Journal: J Cardiovasc Pharmacol; 2002 Apr; 39(4):561-8. PubMed ID: 11904530.
    Abstract:
    The in vivo effects of two unsurmountable angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) antagonists, irbesartan (150 mg) and candesartan (8 mg), were studied in a double-blind, randomized, crossover study in 18 healthy men. The drugs' direct vascular effects were assessed as the rightward shift (dose ratio - 1) of angiotensin dose-effect curves on diastolic blood pressure (DBP). Renal and adrenal effects were assessed by plasma renin activity (PRA), aldosterone concentrations, and antagonistic concentration equivalents (n x Ki) in a radioligand rat lung receptor assay. Both drugs exerted similar substantial (> 30-fold) and long-lasting (> 2-fold 47 h after dosing) rightward shifts of the angiotensin II dose effect declining with half-lives of 15 h irbesartan and 12 h candesartan, respectively. Dose ratio - 1 versus n x Ki showed a linear relationship in Schild regression plots; both drugs increased PRA, decreased DBP, and suppressed aldosterone. The slopes of linear relationship between angiotensin antagonism (dose ratio - 1) and PRA increase were almost threefold steeper (p = 0.005) following irbesartan as compared with candesartan. The findings suggest that for the same degree of angiotensin II antagonism, irbesartan produces a greater increase in PRA than candesartan. These pharmacodynamic differences warrant further investigation and clarification.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]