These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Pleural effusion and empyema as complications of pneumonia].
    Author: Bauwens AM, de Graaff CS, Boersma WG.
    Journal: Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Mar 09; 146(10):464-9. PubMed ID: 11913110.
    Abstract:
    Parapneumonic effusion is observed radiologically in approximately 40% of the patients with a bacterial pneumonia. In most cases the course of the disease is uncomplicated, and the parapneumonic effusion (PPE) resolves with antibiotic therapy. However, in 5-10% of the patients, PPE becomes more complicated (loculation) and the effusion eventually leads to the formation of an empyema if no drainage has been performed. In view of negative impact on morbidity and mortality, it is important to recognise and evaluate a PPE as soon as possible. Intrapleural pus is the only absolute indication for drainage. In all other cases, the risk of a complicated PPE has to be established in the early phase of the illness, based on radiological, biochemical and microbiological parameters of the effusion. Based on these findings one or more of the following therapeutic strategies can be chosen: tube installation with drainage, fibrinolytical therapy, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery, thoracotomy with or without decortication, or open drainage. Although every PPE needs to be evaluated on an individual basis, an attempt has been made to formulate a strategy that can be used in clinical practice, based on recent literature and expert opinions.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]