These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Estimation and optimization of the use of standard arterial input function for split-dose administration of N-isopropyl-p[123I]iodoamphetamine].
    Author: Kurisu R, Ogura T, Takikawa S, Saito H, Nakazawa M, Iida H.
    Journal: Kaku Igaku; 2002 Feb; 39(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 11915308.
    Abstract:
    UNLABELLED: Use of a standard arterial input function and calibrating it by a single blood sample or a continuous arterial blood sample has been researched for a repeat CBF assessment with split-dose administration of N-isopropyl-p[123I]iodoamphetamine (IMP). METHODS: The study population consisted of 5 normal volunteers and 5 patients with cerebrovascular disease. IMP was injected twice (111 MBq/2 ml each) into the anti-cubital vein at a constant infusion speed for 1 min. The arterial input function was monitored during the study including a continuous measurement of radioactivity concentration of both the whole-blood and the octanol-soluble component (Real-Input Function, RIF). Standard input function was determined, and was calibrated either by a single blood sample or a continuous blood sample to estimate the Estimated-Input Function (EIF). Area-Under-the Curve (AUC) was then compared between RIF and EIF. RESULTS: In case EIF was estimated with a single blood sample, the minimum error of estimated AUC was obtained when calibrated at 7 minutes after either the 1st or 2nd injections. Deviation of AUC for [0, 30] was +/- 6.6%, and +/- 5.0%, respectively. If calibrated with a continuous blood sample, the minimum error of AUC with the continuous blood sampling period of 10 min for [0, 30] and [30, 60] was +/- 5.3% and +/- 4.0%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: AUC of EIF with either a single or continuous blood sampling appeared to have reasonably small errors, suggesting the validity of the use of standardized input function in the split-dose IMP SPECT.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]