These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Short-wavelength perimetry in diagnosis of early glaucoma: comparison with standard automated perimetry].
    Author: Qi S, Jiang Y.
    Journal: Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2002 Jan; 38(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 11955298.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To assess the value of short-wavelength automated perimetry in the diagnosis of early glaucoma. METHODS: Fourty-six eyes of 36 patients with early open angle glaucoma and a group of 38 normal persons (46 eyes) were examined both by the standard automated (white-on-white, W/W) perimeter and short-wavelength (blue-on-yellow, B/Y) perimeter. The age and sex in two groups were matched. The program 24 - 2 was performed on both B/Y and W/W fields in two groups. The mean light sensitivity (MS) of the central 25 degrees and in each quadrant from two perimetries was calculated and analyzed statistically by Student t-test and ASNOV. RESULTS: The difference of MS in central 25 degrees between two perimetries in normal group was 1.63 dB which showed a statistical significance of difference (t = 3.57, P < 0.001). MS was significantly higher in W/W than that in B/Y either in central 25 degrees or in each corresponding quadrant (t = 3.45, P < 0.001). The MS difference between them was more than 2.87 dB and the MS average difference of the corresponding quadrant was more than 2.5 dB (t = 4.57, 3.42, P < 0.001). MS from four quadrants were different from one other. The lowest MS was in the superior temporal, the highest MS was in inferior nasal quadrant; the superior nasal and inferior temporal were in between them. The defects in B/Y perimetry were larger and deeper than that in W/W perimetry. The result of corrected deviation points (u = 3.22, P < 0.05) was used to account the defected testing points, which showed the defected points were significantly more in B/Y perimetry than that in W/W perimetry (chi(2) = 226.72, P < 0.001). The data revealed that the defected testing points from B/Y perimetry were 2.6 times of that from W/W perimetry. In the early glaucoma group, the positive rate in the abnormal visual field from B/Y perimetry was 87% (40/46) and that from W/W perimetry, 67% (31/46). CONCLUSIONS: A good coincidence is demonstrated between B/Y and W/W perimetries both in normal and in early open angle glaucoma groups. B/Y perimetry is more sensitive than W/W perimetry in detecting early glaucomatous visual field defects. The positive rate is higher and the defects are larger and deeper in B/Y perimetry than that in W/W perimetry. Therefore, B/Y perimetry can detect glaucoma defects earlier. It is suggested that B/Y perimetry be applied in diagnosing early glaucoma.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]