These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Post-exposure treatment against HIV outside of the hospital in Amsterdam, January-December 2000].
    Author: Sonder GJ, Regez RM, Brinkman K, Prins JM, Mulder JW, Coutinho RA, van den Hoek JA.
    Journal: Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Mar 30; 146(13):629-33. PubMed ID: 11957386.
    Abstract:
    The Infectious Diseases Department of the Amsterdam Public Health Service regularly sees people who have possibly been exposed to human body fluids infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV), hepatitis C virus (HCV) or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), as a result of incidents in either a non-hospital-related occupation or during their leisure time. Until January 2000, people reporting possible exposure were referred to hospitals for HIV post-exposure prophylaxis (HIV-PEP), whereas for HBV and HCV, the tracing of the infection source and the follow-up took place at the Public Health Service clinic. Since the introduction of a new protocol in January 2000, the Public Health Service as well as a hospital can establish an indication for HIV-PEP and prescribe it. In 2000, 322 persons reported to the Public Health Service. The source was tested in 194 incidents and an HIV test was carried out on 104 occasions. In 19 cases HIV antibodies were found or the source was known to be HIV positive. A total of 50 people were prescribed HIV-PEP; 16 times after a needle-stick accident, 22 times after a sexual accident, 6 times after a bite-wound and 6 times after direct exposure to human blood. The sources of 30 PEP recipients could be tested and after this 16 recipients could stop with the treatment due to a negative HIV test. In 4 cases PEP treatment was stopped following a review of the indication. Therefore, 30 people had an indication to complete the PEP treatment. Of these, more than 80% reported side effects and 3 people had to withdraw from the treatment at an early stage because of this. The implementation of the protocol has resulted in less confusion because the follow-up now takes place at one location. Compared to other studies, the average time between exposure and treatment is shorter and compliance is good. In the period up to 15 May 2001, no seroconversions had been observed.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]