These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Comparison of nicardipine and isradipine in hypertension following coronary artery bypass graft].
    Author: Madi-Jebara S, Khater-Rassi D, Yazigi A, Haddad F, Hayek G, Achkouty R, Antakly MC.
    Journal: Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2002 Mar; 21(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 11963384.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: Compare the efficacy of isradipine to that of nicardipine for the control of arterial hypertension following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). STUDY DESIGN: Clinical prospective, randomised study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 40 patients ASA II or III, mean age 66 +/- 8 years, scheduled for elective CABG were included. If the mean arterial pressure (MAP) was > or = 100 mmHg within the first six post operative hours, the patients were included and randomly attributed to either one of the 2 groups: Gr I (n = 20) received nicardipine, Gr II (n = 20) received isradipine in bolus then in continuous perfusion. HR, MAP, MPAP, CVP, PCWP, CI, SVRI, PVRI and SVI were recorded at: T0 before administration of drugs, T1 = 2 min after the first bolus. T2 when MAP reached 85 +/- 5 mmHg. T3, T4, T5, T6, T7 and T8 at 5, 10, 30, 60, 90 and 120 min after the continuous perfusion. T9 before stopping the perfusion. RESULTS: No significant changes in HR, CVP, PCWP, MPAP or PVRI at any time in both groups. Significant increase in CI at T2 in both groups. Reduction of MAP at T2 was more important (-27%) in Gr I compared to that in Gr II (-22%). This was mainly due to a significant decrease in SVRI. CONCLUSION: Isradipine is effective in the treatment of arterial hypertension following CABG. However there is not any significant beneficial effect of isradipine over nicardipine.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]