These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Expression of Dp260 in muscle tethers the actin cytoskeleton to the dystrophin-glycoprotein complex and partially prevents dystrophy.
    Author: Warner LE, DelloRusso C, Crawford RW, Rybakova IN, Patel JR, Ervasti JM, Chamberlain JS.
    Journal: Hum Mol Genet; 2002 May 01; 11(9):1095-105. PubMed ID: 11978768.
    Abstract:
    Dystrophin forms a mechanical link between the actin cytoskeleton and the extracellular matrix in muscle that helps maintain sarcolemmal integrity. Two regions of dystrophin have been shown to bind actin: the N-terminal domain and rod domain repeats 11-17. To better understand the roles of these two domains and whether the rod domain actin-binding domain alone can support a mechanically functional link with actin, we constructed transgenic mice expressing Dp260 in skeletal muscle. Dp260, the retinal isoform of dystrophin, lacks the N-terminal domain and a significant portion of the rod domain, but retains the rod domain actin-binding domain. Our results indicate that Dp260 expression restores a stable association between costameric actin and the sarcolemma, assembles the dystrophin-glycoprotein complex, and significantly slows the progression of the dystrophy in the dystrophin-deficient mdx mouse. We assessed the functional integrity of the mechanical link in Dp260 transgenic mdx mice and found that Dp260 muscles showed normal resistance to contraction-induced injury, but dramatic reductions in force generation similar to those found with mdx muscles. Morphologically, Dp260 muscles displayed reduced amounts of inflammation and fibrosis, but still showed a significant, albeit reduced, amount of degeneration/regeneration. These data demonstrate that protection from contraction-induced injury can dramatically ameliorate, but not completely halt, the dystrophic process. We suggest that a non-mechanical defect, attributed to the loss of the N terminus of dystrophin, is likely responsible for the residual dystrophy observed.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]