These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Effect of solution viscosity on intramolecular electron transfer in sulfite oxidase. Author: Feng C, Kedia RV, Hazzard JT, Hurley JK, Tollin G, Enemark JH. Journal: Biochemistry; 2002 May 07; 41(18):5816-21. PubMed ID: 11980485. Abstract: Our previous studies have shown that the rate constant for intramolecular electron transfer (IET) between the heme and molybdenum centers of chicken liver sulfite oxidase varies from approximately 20 to 1400 s(-1) depending upon reaction conditions [Pacheco, A., Hazzard, J. T., Tollin, G., and Enemark, J. H. (1999) J. Biol. Inorg. Chem. 4, 390-401]. These two centers are linked by a flexible polypeptide loop, suggesting that conformational changes, which alter the Mo-Fe distance, may play an important role in the observed IET rates. In this study, we have investigated IET in sulfite oxidase using laser flash photolysis as a function of solution viscosity. The solution viscosity was varied over the range of 1.0-2.0 cP by addition of either polyethylene glycol 400 or sucrose. In the presence of either viscosogen, an appreciable decrease in the IET rate constant value is observed with an increase in the solvent viscosity. The IET rate constant exhibits a linear dependence on the negative 0.7th power of the viscosity. Steady-state kinetics and EPR experiments are consistent with the interpretation that viscosity, and not other properties of the added viscosogens, is responsible for the dependence of IET rates on the solvent composition. The results are consistent with the role of conformational changes on IET in sulfite oxidase, which helps to clarify the inconsistency between the large rate constant for IET between the Mo and Fe centers and the long distance (approximately 32 A) between these two metal centers observed in the crystal structure [Kisker, C., Schindelin, H., Pacheco, A., Wehbi, W., Garnett, R. M., Rajagopalan, K. V., Enemark, J. H., and Rees, D. C. (1997) Cell 91, 973-983].[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]