These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Interference screw divergence in femoral tunnel fixation during endoscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring grafts. Author: Miller CM, Tibone JE, Hewitt M, Kharrazi FD, Elattrache NS. Journal: Arthroscopy; 2002; 18(5):510-4. PubMed ID: 11987062. Abstract: PURPOSE: To compare the divergence angles between bioabsorbable interference screws inserted into the femoral tunnel with the screwdriver placed through the anteromedial portal to those inserted with the screwdriver placed through the tibial tunnel and to examine the effect of the femoral tunnel interference screws' divergence angles on fixation strength of hamstring grafts after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction using hamstring grafts. TYPE OF STUDY: Cadaveric biomechanical pullout study. METHODS: ACL reconstruction was performed in 8 pairs of fresh-frozen human cadaveric knees using hamstring grafts fixed within the femoral tunnels using bioabsorbable interference screws. Within matched pairs, 1 screw was placed into the femoral tunnel using a screwdriver placed through the tibial tunnel (group 1), and in the other knee it was placed into the femoral tunnel using a screwdriver placed through the anteromedial portal (group 2). Radiographs were taken to measure the degree of divergence between the interference screw and the femoral tunnel. After disarticulation, pullout strength was then measured using a cyclic-loading model. RESULTS: In group 2, there was significantly more divergence between the screw and the femoral tunnel compared with group 1, particularly in the sagittal plane (average 14.4 degrees compared with 3.4 degrees, P =.00014). With the number of specimens available for comparison, no significant difference was detected between the 2 groups with regard to 3 mm and 5 mm of pullout when cyclically loaded (P =.77 and.74, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The increased technical difficulty, combined with the potential risks of tibial tunnel widening and graft damage, with placement of the screwdriver through the tibial tunnel for the purpose of decreasing femoral interference screw divergence in ACL reconstruction using hamstring grafts may not be justified.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]