These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Memory processes governing amphetamine-induced psychomotor sensitization.
    Author: Anagnostaras SG, Schallert T, Robinson TE.
    Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology; 2002 Jun; 26(6):703-15. PubMed ID: 12007741.
    Abstract:
    We investigated how, under certain circumstances, the expression of psychomotor sensitization comes to be context-specific. Rats that had previously sustained 6-hydroxydopamine-induced unilateral dopamine depletion received repeated injections of d-amphetamine (AMPH) or saline in group-specific environments, and rotational behavior was measured as an index of psychomotor activation. Following these treatments some groups were given electroconvulsive shock (ECS), when memories of the drug experience were reactivated (and therefore vulnerable to disruption), in order to produce retrograde amnesia. Animals given an AMPH challenge in the environment in which they received drug treatments (Paired) expressed robust sensitization. Animals given an AMPH challenge in a context that was never paired with drug administration (Unpaired) did not express sensitization. A saline challenge in the AMPH paired context produced a conditioned rotational response (CR). ECS had no effect in Control animals, no effect on the expression of sensitization in Paired animals, and no effect on the expression of the CR in Paired animals. However, ECS did affect Unpaired groups: unlike Unpaired animals given sham ECS, Unpaired animals given ECS expressed robust sensitization. Thus, without ECS, the expression of sensitization must have been suppressed in the Unpaired animals (who had the same drug history as Paired animals), and ECS released this otherwise suppressed sensitization. Based on these and other findings, we propose that three memory mechanisms regulate context-specificity of AMPH sensitization: (1) Repeated drug administration induces sensitization of the neural substrate that mediates the unconditional response (UR) to the drug, a form of non-associative learning; (2) An inhibitory process can block the expression of neural sensitization in contexts where the drug is not expected, a process we speculate may involve a form of inhibitory occasion-setting; (3) An excitatory conditioned response (CR) can amplify the sensitized response in a context where the drug is expected. It is suggested that the ability of drug-associated contexts to modulate the expression of neural sensitization via occasion-setting may combine with the ability of a drug-associated context to produce conditioned responses, together providing powerful associative control over not only behavioral sensitization, but in addicts, over craving and relapse.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]