These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Wound complications of laparoscopic vs open colectomy.
    Author: Winslow ER, Fleshman JW, Birnbaum EH, Brunt LM.
    Journal: Surg Endosc; 2002 Oct; 16(10):1420-5. PubMed ID: 12085142.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: This study was conducted to determine if laparoscopic colon surgery has changed the incidence of wound complications after colon resection. METHODS: Eighty-three patients were randomized to undergo either laparoscopic (LCR) or open colon resection (OCR) for cancer at our institution as part of a multicenter trial. Data were tabulated from review of the prospective database and physician records. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients were randomized to LCR and 46 to OCR. Seven patients in the LCR group were converted to OCR. LCR was performed using a limited midline incision for anastomosis and specimen extraction. Incision length was significantly greater (p <0.001) in the OCR group (19.4 +/- 5.6 cm) compared to the LCR extraction site (6.3 +/- 1.4 cm). Wound infections occurred in 13.5% of patients after LCR (2.7% trocar, 10.8% extraction sites) and in 10.9% of patients after OCR. Over a mean follow-up period of 30.1 +/- 17.8 months, incisional hernias developed in 24.3% of patients after LCR and 17.4% after OCR. In the LCR group, extraction sites accounted for 85.7% of all wound complications. CONCLUSIONS: The extraction site for LCR is associated with a high incidence of complications, comparable to open colectomy. Strategies to alter operative technique should be considered to reduce the incidence of these complications.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]