These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: A randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic ovarian diathermy versus gonadotropin therapy for women with clomiphene citrate-resistant polycystic ovary syndrome. Author: Farquhar CM, Williamson K, Gudex G, Johnson NP, Garland J, Sadler L. Journal: Fertil Steril; 2002 Aug; 78(2):404-11. PubMed ID: 12137881. Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of laparoscopic ovarian diathermy with gonadotropin ovulation induction for women with clomiphene citrate-resistant polycystic ovary syndrome. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTING: A tertiary referral fertility clinic. PATIENT(S): Women with anovulatory infertility secondary to clomiphene-resistant polycystic ovary syndrome. Inclusion criteria were age of <39 years, body mass index of <35 kg/m(2), failure to ovulate with 150 mg of clomiphene citrate for 5 days in the early follicular phase, >12 months of infertility, and no other causes of infertility. INTERVENTION(S): Laparoscopic ovarian diathermy versus three cycles of urinary or recombinant gonadotropins. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Cumulative pregnancy and miscarriage rates. RESULT(S): Cumulative pregnancy rates were 28% at 6 months for laparoscopic ovarian diathermy and 33% for three cycles of ovulation induction with gonadotropins. There were three miscarriages in each group. Women in the laparoscopic ovarian diathermy arm of the study had four additional spontaneous pregnancies 6 to 12 months after surgery. CONCLUSION(S): There was no statistically significant difference in pregnancy or miscarriage rates during the 6-month follow-up period or the three cycles. Laparoscopic ovarian diathermy is a safe and effective alternative to ovulation induction with gonadotropins.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]