These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Tenderfoot Preemie vs a manual lancet: a clinical evaluation.
    Author: Kellam B, Sacks LM, Wailer JL, Kathen C, McLaurin C, Doster C, Schnaible S, Youmans M.
    Journal: Neonatal Netw; 2001 Oct; 20(7):31-6. PubMed ID: 12144204.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To compare the amount of time required to collect a blood specimen, the number of heel punctures required, and the rate of hematology re-collections required when using a Monolet lancet vs a Tenderfoot Preemie device. DESIGN: Randomized, two-group, quasi-experimental. SAMPLE: Neonates with a birth weight >800 gm were eligible to participate in the study. Twenty subjects were randomized to the Monolet lancet (control) group and 20 to the Tenderfoot Preemie (experimental) group. A total of 157 blood specimens was collected, 89 of which were for hematology testing. RESULTS: For this sample population of preterm infants, less collection time was required, fewer heel punctures were necessary, and a lower re-collection rate occurred with use of the Tenderfoot Preemie than with use of the Monolet lancet.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]