These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: [Alveolar and hard palate repair by tibial periosteal graft in complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. Long-term follow-up of 51 cases]. Author: Raphaël B, Morand B, Bettega G, Lesne C, Lesne V. Journal: Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 2002 Jun; 47(3):196-203. PubMed ID: 12148225. Abstract: PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: The purpose of this study was double: appreciate the osteogenic and growth capacities of the free tibial periosteal graft concerning the alveolar and hard palate repair in the complete unilateral cleft lip and palate, and evaluate long-term follow-up concerning maxillo-mandibular morphology and palatal air-tight. MATERIAL AND METHOD: This retrospective study concerns 51 patients, of more than 13 years of age, treated for complete unilateral cleft lip and palate. The treatment included a Skoog type cheiloplasty, a tibial periosteal graft between 4 and 6 months (as described by M. Stricker) and a staphyloraphy between 8 and 18 months. Our documentation was: figures, pictures and precise description of the initial cleft, dental casts, teleradiographies, dental panorams performed at different stages of treatment, orthodontic, orthophonic and otologic follow-up. Growth was evaluated using casts during the first 6 years then by profil teleradiographies after puberty. Ossification was evaluated quantitatively by CT scan in 18 patients. RESULTS: Results confirm an ossification of the periosteal graft in 72% of cases and the advantage of periosteal graft in palatal air-tight. 85% of cases show equilibrated squeletal growth with good occlusion, and 13.7% of cases needed deferral osteotomy. CONCLUSION: We propose a method for long-term cleft results evaluation, with the use of periosteal graft.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]