These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of the Etest and the sensititre colorimetric methods with the NCCLS proposed standard for antifungal susceptibility testing of Aspergillus species.
    Author: Meletiadis J, Mouton JW, Meis JF, Bouman BA, Verweij PE.
    Journal: J Clin Microbiol; 2002 Aug; 40(8):2876-85. PubMed ID: 12149345.
    Abstract:
    The susceptibilities of 25 clinical isolates of Aspergillus fumigatus, A. flavus, A. terreus, A. nidulans, and A. ustus to itraconazole and amphotericin B were determined by an agar diffusion-dilution method (the Etest method) and a colorimetric broth microdilution method (the Sensititre method); and the results were compared with those obtained by the NCCLS proposed standard M-38P method for antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi. Various MIC endpoints for the three methods were determined visually by four different observers in three blinded experiments, and the reproducibilities among the observers (interobserver agreement) and among the replicates (interexperimental agreement) as well as the levels of agreement between the NCCLS, the Etest, and the Sensititre methods were calculated. High levels of reproducibility (within 1 twofold dilution) were found for the NCCLS method (>95%) with the MIC-0 endpoint (complete inhibition of growth) for both drugs and with the MIC-1 endpoint (slight growth) for itraconazole and for the Sensititre method (>90%) with all MIC endpoints, although for the latter the interexperimental agreement for itraconazole was comparatively lower (83 to 93%). The Etest method was less reproducible (67 to 87%) for both drugs. Using the recommended MIC endpoints, high levels of agreement (within one twofold dilution) between the NCCLS and the Sensititre methods for all species were found for amphotericin B (>77%) but not for itraconazole (<66%), for which the MICs by the Sensititre method were up to 3 twofold dilutions lower than the corresponding MICs by the NCCLS method. The use of the first blue well as an endpoint for the Sensititre method and 48 h of incubation improved the levels of agreement with the NCCLS method. Low levels of agreement between the NCCLS and the Etest methods using the recommended MIC endpoints were found for most species, especially after 48 h of incubation (<50%), when the MICs obtained by the Etest method were up to 9 twofold dilutions higher than the corresponding MICs obtained by the NCCLS method. Relatively better agreement was found after 24 h, although it was species dependent, with the highest levels of agreement (>82%) found for A. terreus and A. ustus for amphotericin B and A. fumigatus for both drugs. Overall, better agreement was found when MIC-0 was used as the MIC endpoint for the NCCLS method for both drugs and when the MICs by the Etest method were determined after 48 h of incubation for itraconazole and after 24 h of incubation for amphotericin B.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]