These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Muscle activation during exercises to improve trunk stability in men with low back pain.
    Author: Hubley-Kozey CL, Vezina MJ.
    Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2002 Aug; 83(8):1100-8. PubMed ID: 12161831.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the relative activation amplitudes from 3 abdominal and 2 trunk extensor muscle sites of persons with low back pain (LBP) performing the pelvic-tilt, the abdominal-hollowing, and level 1 of the trunk stability test (TST) exercises and to compare the activation amplitudes among muscle sites and exercises. DESIGN: A prospective, comparative, repeated-measures design. SETTING: Motion analysis research laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Fourteen men with LBP (mean duration, 8y; mean age +/- standard deviation, 39+/-5y). INTERVENTIONS: Subjects performed 3 exercises in random order while surface electromyograms were recorded from 5 muscle sites: lower and upper rectus abdominus, external oblique, erector spinae, and multifidus. The exercises were divided into 2 phases: a movement phase and a stabilization phase. The root-mean-square (RMS) electromyographic amplitude for each phase was calculated and normalized to the highest RMS amplitude from a series of 4 exercises, which attempted to elicit maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVICs) for each muscle. A 2-factor, repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) tested the muscle by exercise interaction and the 2 main effects for each phase separately. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Normalized RMS amplitude was the main dependent variable. The ensemble-average profiles for each muscle were calculated to examine the phasing of activation throughout the exercises. RESULTS: The ANOVA revealed a statistically significant muscle-by-exercise interaction (P<.05) for both phases, which showed that the 3 exercises; recruited the 5 muscle sites using different patterns of relative amplitudes. The external oblique muscle site was activated to higher amplitudes than the other 4 muscle sites for all 3 exercises; the highest normalized RMS activity occurred at the external oblique during the pelvic tilt (32% MVIC). The phasic patterns among the 5 muscle sites were not consistent for the TST but were consistent among the 5 sites for the other 2 exercises. CONCLUSIONS: None of the exercises recruited the abdominal muscles to intensities deemed adequate for strengthening. The TST challenges the coordination of muscle activity during the leg-loading task (stabilization phase) as evidenced by changes in amplitudes over the total exercise time for the external oblique site, but not the other 4 sites. All 3 exercises could be used as initial exercises in a dynamic stability progression when low-recruitment amplitudes of specific muscles were the objective but not for strengthening.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]