These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Differences in strength and surface electromyogram characteristics between pre-pubertal gymnasts and untrained boys during brief and maintained maximal isometric voluntary contractions. Author: Halin R, Germain P, Buttelli O, Kapitaniak B. Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol; 2002 Aug; 87(4-5):409-15. PubMed ID: 12172881. Abstract: The present study was aimed at investigating differences of maximal strength (F(max)) of the elbow flexors and characteristics of the surface electromyogram (EMG) between six gymnasts (G) and six untrained (UT) 10-year-old boys during brief and maintained maximal voluntary isometric contraction (MVC). The F(max) was estimated during 5 s MVC (maximal test, MT) and normalized to the cross sectional area (CSA) of the arm. The EMG signal of the biceps brachii was recorded during MT and during a 25 s maintained MVC (fatigue test). Values were calculated for root-mean-square (rms(MT)) and mean power frequency (MPF(MT)) of the EMG signal for the duration of the MT. For the fatigue test, MPF were normalized to the initial value (MPF(n)) and kinetics were expressed by the slope coefficient of linear regression. Although F(max) and F(max)/CSA tended to be higher for G than UT, the differences did not reach significance. The MPF(MT) was significantly higher for G [mean (SD)][136 (8) Hz] than for UT [125 (9) Hz]. The MPF(n) slope coefficients were significantly greater for G than for UT [-1.0 (0.2) and -0.5 (0.3), respectively]. When all the children were considered, F(max) was significantly correlated to MPF(MT) (r = 0.61). These results showed that gymnasts tend to have higher F(max) and F(max)/CSA accompanied by a significantly higher MPF(MT) and a steeper MPF downshift. Moreover, children with greater strength tended to have higher MPF(MT). It is suggested that spatial and/or temporal recruitment of more fatigable fast motor units could have been enhanced in G and more generally, that it could be a mechanism that would explains, in part, the level of force production in children.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]