These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Cerebrovascular carbon dioxide reactivity in sheep: effect of propofol or isoflurane anaesthesia.
    Author: Myburgh JA, Upton RN, Ludbrook GL, Martinez A, Grant C.
    Journal: Anaesth Intensive Care; 2002 Aug; 30(4):413-21. PubMed ID: 12180577.
    Abstract:
    Propofol and isoflurane are commonly used in neuroanaesthesia. Some published data suggest that the use of these agents is associated with impaired cerebral blood flow/carbon dioxide (CO2) reactivity. Cerebrovascular CO2 reactivity was therefore measured in three cohorts of adult merino sheep: awake (n=6), anaesthetized with steady-state propofol (15 mg/min; n=6) and anaesthetized with 2% isoflurane (n=6). Changes in cerebral blood flow were measured continuously from changes in velocities of blood in the sagittal sinus via a Doppler probe. Alterations in the partial pressure of carbon dioxide in arterial blood (PaCO2) over the range 18-63 mmHg were achieved by altering either the inspired CO2 concentration or the rate of mechanical ventilation. Cerebral blood flow/CO2 relationships were determined by linear regression analysis, with changes in cerebral blood flow expressed as a percentage of the value for a PaCO2 of 35 mmHg. Propofol decreased cerebral blood flow by 55% relative to pre-anaesthesia values (P=0.0001), while isoflurane did not significantly alter cerebral blood flow (88.45% of baseline, P=0.39). Significant linear relationships between cerebral blood flow and CO2 tension were determined in all individual studies (r2 ranged from 0.72 to 0.99). The slopes of the lines were highly variable between individuals for the awake cohort (mean 4.73, 1.42-7.12, 95% CI). The slopes for the propofol (mean 2.67, 2.06-3.28, 95% CI) and isoflurane (mean 2.82, 219-3.45, 95% CI) cohorts were more predictable. However, there was no significant difference between these anaesthetic agents with respect to the CO2 reactivity of cerebral blood flow.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]