These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Differential activation of Gq/11 and Gi(3) proteins at 5-hydroxytryptamine(2C) receptors revealed by antibody capture assays: influence of receptor reserve and relationship to agonist-directed trafficking.
    Author: Cussac D, Newman-Tancredi A, Duqueyroix D, Pasteau V, Millan MJ.
    Journal: Mol Pharmacol; 2002 Sep; 62(3):578-89. PubMed ID: 12181434.
    Abstract:
    As determined by a guanosine 5'-O-(3-[(35)S]thio)triphosphate ([(35)S]GTPgammaS) binding assay, which does not distinguish G protein subtypes, 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) and 2(S)- 1-(6-chloro-5-fluoro-1H-indol-1-yl)-2-propanamine fumarate (Ro600175) behaved as full agonists at human 5-HT(2C) (h5-HT(2C)) receptors (VSV isoform) stably expressed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells, whereas 1-2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl-2-aminopropane (DOI), d-lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), and lisuride exhibited partial agonist properties. After treatment with pertussis toxin to uncouple 5-HT(2C) receptors from Gi/Go but not Gq/11, DOI and LSD were as efficacious as 5-HT and Ro600175 in stimulating [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding, whereas lisuride still exhibited low efficacy (40%). Correspondingly, in a scintillation proximity assay employing specific antibodies against Gq/11, 5-HT, Ro600175, DOI, and LSD behaved as high-efficacy agonists, whereas lisuride showed efficacy of 36%. In contrast, when employing a specific antibody recognizing Gi(3), DOI and LSD were less efficacious (80 and 30%, respectively) than 5-HT and Ro600175, and lisuride was inactive. Agonist actions were specifically mediated by h5-HT(2C) receptors inasmuch as the selective 5-HT(2C) antagonist SB242,084 blocked [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding at both Gq/11 and Gi(3). Agonist potency for stimulation of Gi(3) was ~6- to 8-fold less than for Gq/11, indicating that the latter was preferentially engaged by h5-HT(2C) receptors. Inactivation of h5-HT(2C) receptors with the alkylating agent N-ethoxycarbonyl-2-ethoxy-1,2-dihydroquinoline did not modify the efficacy of 5-HT, Ro600175, and DOI at Gq/11, whereas their efficacies were substantially reduced at Gi(3), indicating a greater receptor reserve for the former. Finally, the preferential activation of Gq/11 versus Gi(3) by DOI, LSD, and lisuride was diminished in the presence of lower receptor number. In conclusion, h5-HT(2C) receptors couple to both Gq/11 and Gi(3) in CHO cells, and efficacy for G protein subtype activation is both ligand- and receptor reserve-dependent.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]