These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Head and eye movements in visual search using night vision goggles.
    Author: Geri GA, Martin EL, Wetzel PA.
    Journal: Aviat Space Environ Med; 2002 Aug; 73(8):779-86. PubMed ID: 12182218.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Night-vision goggles (NVGs) provide only a restricted field of view and have other characteristics that may affect the head and eye movements used in visual search. METHODS: We measured head scan patterns, the magnitude and duration of gaze saccades, and fixation duration as subjects searched computer generated imagery either with or without NVGs. Subjects searched for either a large (6 degrees) target on a low-detail background (high conspicuity condition) or a small (2 degrees) target on a high-detail background (low conspicuity condition). RESULTS: All subjects displayed head-scan patterns that were qualitatively similar to those reported in the literature. Although both head-scan speed and amplitude were higher for the NVG condition as compared with the no-NVG condition, the difference was not statistically significant. Head-scan speed did vary significantly with target conspicuity, however. Gaze saccade amplitude varied with target conspicuity but only when NVGs were used. Fixation duration did not vary with either NVG use or target conspicuity. A two-parameter (exponent and scaling parameter) power function was fitted to the amplitude-duration data. The power-function exponents varied from about 0.30 to 0.44, but there was a concommitant variation in the scaling parameter, and the result was no significant difference in the form of the power functions fitted to the data. CONCLUSIONS: NVG use did not significantly affect any of the individual head or eye movement variables involved in searching the computer-generated imagery studied here. However, the decrease in gaze-saccade amplitude with increased target conspicuity when NVGs were used is evidence of the sensitivity of the head and eye movement measurement techniques used here, and suggests that all available measures of response efficiency be considered when evaluating NVGs using complex stimuli.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]