These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Noninvasive carbon dioxide monitoring during neurosurgical procedures in adults: end-tidal versus transcutaneous techniques. Author: McBride DS, Johnson JO, Tobias JD. Journal: South Med J; 2002 Aug; 95(8):870-4. PubMed ID: 12190224. Abstract: BACKGROUND: We prospectively compared transcutaneous (TC) versus end-tidal (ET) carbon dioxide monitoring during neurosurgical procedures in adults. METHODS: After calibration and an equilibration time for the TC-CO2 monitor, arterial blood gas (ABG) values were obtained as clinically indicated. The PaCO2 values were compared with the values recorded by the noninvasive monitors (TC and ET). RESULTS: The ET-CO2 to PaCO2 difference was 6.1 +/- 5.6 mm Hg, and the TC-CO2 to PaCO2 difference was 3.7 +/- 2.9 mm Hg. The difference between the PaCO2 and ET-CO2 was 3 mm Hg or less in 17 of 57 values, while the difference between the PaCO2 and TC-CO2 was 3 mm Hg or less in 35 of 57 values. Linear regression analysis of ET-CO2 versus PaCO2 revealed a slope of 0.381 +/- 0.007. Linear regression analysis of TC-CO2 versus PaCO2 revealed a slope of 1.17 +/- 0.008. CONCLUSION: Transcutaneous CO2 monitoring provides a more accurate estimate of PaCO2 than ET-CO2 monitoring during neurosurgical procedures.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]