These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The influence of brightness, colour and complexity on visual evoked doppler flow responses.
    Author: Zaletel M, Zvan B, Strucl M, Pogacnik T, Kiauta T.
    Journal: Ultrasound Med Biol; 2002 Jul; 28(7):917-22. PubMed ID: 12208335.
    Abstract:
    The purpose of this study was to evaluate specific influence of colour, brightness and complexity on visual evoked flow responses (VEFRs). A total of 31 healthy subjects aged 35.1 +/- 7.7 years participated in the study. Mean arterial velocity was measured in the right posterior cerebral artery (v(pca)) and in the left middle cerebral artery (v(mca)) by Multi-DopX4 (DWL). Simple-white (SW), red (R) and complex-checkerboard (C) stimuli were used. VEFRs were determined by the difference of the v(pca):v(mca) ratio before and after stimulation. The VEFRs of SW with brightness of 21.4 cd/m(2), 10.5 cd/m(2) and 2 cd/m(2) were 8.7 +/- 3.4%, 9.1 +/- 3.0% and 8.0 +/- 3.7%, respectively (p < 0.001). The VEFRs of R and C stimuli were 10.4 +/- 6.5% and 12.4 +/- 6.1%, respectively (p < 0.001). ANOVA for repeated measurements did not show significant variances (p = 0.295) between VEFRs of SW of different brightness, but variances between VEFRs of SW, R and C stimuli were significant (p < 0.001). We found significant differences between VEFRs of SW and of C stimuli (3.8 +/- 1.9%, p < 0.001), VEFRs of SW and of R stimuli (1.8 +/- 2.4%, p = 0.008) as well as between VEFRs of C and of R stimuli (2.0 +/- 2.5%, p = 0.010). We have concluded that SW, R and C stimuli have a specific influence on VEFRs. Brightness does not appear to affect VEFRs.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]