These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: The rise and fall and rise of the IUD. Author: Burnhill MS. Journal: Am J Gynecol Health; 1989; 3(3-S):6-10. PubMed ID: 12285000. Abstract: The history of IUD use, from the ring used by Richter in 1909 to the present, is described as 3 surges of popularity. The 1st IUDs were catgut rings with or without tails, and the Pust stainless and Ota rings. A worldwide pandemic or gonorrhea, and the population policies before and during World War II ended the popularity of IUDs temporarily. In 1959 IUDs re-emerged, proliferating to over 100 models, most of which were barium impregnated polyethylene, such as the Lippes Loop. Other models that had lesser success were several stainless springs that predisposed to embedding and perforations and the Majzlin spring with a multifilament tail that caused pelvic infection. The Dalkon shield, also bearing a multifilament nylon tail, brought the second wave of IUDs to a rapid end in the 1980s, because its multifilament tail increased risk of infection, midtrimester amnionitis, ectopic pregnancy, tubo-ovarian abscess, infertility, hysterectomy, and death. Robbins Company eventually recalled the Dalkon shield, and later became bankrupt from lawsuits. Other IUD makers, such as Searle, manufacturer of the well-tolerated and popular Copper-7, and Ortho, were subject to litigation, and removed their IUDs from the market, even though their products were still approved by the FDA. During this interim, several new copper bearing IUDs were being developed and tested. The TCU380A, like a Tatum-T with twice as much copper, developed and brought through FDA approval by the Population Council, was licensed and marketed by GynoPharma Corporation as the ParaGard. ParaGard is the most effective IUD to date for U.S. women, with pregnancy rates 1/100 after 2 years of use. Simultaneously, the Alza Corporation released Progestasert, a progesterone-releasing IUD. Progestasert has a 1.3% failure rate, and must be replaced yearly, but is the IUD of choice and therapeutic for women with dysmenorrhea or heavy menstrual flow. Progestasert appears to lessen tubal inflammation, but consequently permits more ectopic pregnancies than other IUDs.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]