These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Size of lesion is not a criterion for resection during management of giant liver haemangioma.
    Author: Terkivatan T, Vrijland WW, Den Hoed PT, De Man RA, Hussain SM, Tilanus HW, IJzermans JN.
    Journal: Br J Surg; 2002 Oct; 89(10):1240-4. PubMed ID: 12296890.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: The unknown natural history and risk of complications of large haemangiomas may pose therapeutic dilemmas. The authors describe their experience with the management of giant haemangiomas. METHODS: Patients with a giant haemangioma were identified by a survey of the hospital database. Forty-nine patients with a haemangioma of at least 4 cm in diameter presented between January 1990 and December 2000. Medical records were analysed retrospectively. RESULTS: Eleven patients had surgical treatment and 38 were managed conservatively. The median diameter of the tumours was 8.0 cm in surgically treated patients and 6.0 cm in the group managed by observation. Surgery-related morbidity occurred in three patients, and abdominal complaints persisted in three of ten patients with a symptomatic lesion. During a median follow-up of 52 months, 12 non-operated patients had mild abdominal complaints, considered to be unrelated to the lesion. In these patients symptoms either diminished or became minimal during follow-up. Complications did not occur. CONCLUSION: Observation of giant haemangiomas can be performed safely. The authors advocate resection of cavernous liver haemangiomas only in patients with persistent severe symptoms.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]