These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Effects of the herbal extract PC-SPES on microtubule dynamics and paclitaxel-mediated prostate tumor growth inhibition.
    Author: Bonham MJ, Galkin A, Montgomery B, Stahl WL, Agus D, Nelson PS.
    Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Nov 06; 94(21):1641-7. PubMed ID: 12419791.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: PC-SPES is a botanical preparation shown to have efficacy in patients with androgen-dependent and androgen-independent prostate carcinoma. Several herbal constituents in PC-SPES inhibit tumor growth through cell cycle arrest and apoptosis, although the mechanisms of these activities are poorly defined. We sought to identify PC-SPES-induced changes in gene expression, specifically in those genes encoding cytoskeletal proteins that could be associated with PC-SPES-induced cytoxicity. METHODS: LNCaP prostate carcinoma cells were treated with PC-SPES, and changes in gene expression were determined by complementary DNA (cDNA) microarray hybridization and northern blot analyses. PC-SPES and paclitaxel, a microtubule-stabilizing drug, effects on microtubules were assessed by immunofluorescence of treated cells and by in vitro tubulin polymerization assays. In vivo effects of PC-SPES and paclitaxel were assessed using CWR22R androgen-independent prostate cancer xenografts. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: PC-SPES treatment of LNCaP cells for 24 hours altered the expression of 17 cytoskeletal genes. mRNA levels of alpha-tubulin decreased sevenfold. Although paclitaxel stabilized and PC-SPES treatment disrupted microtubule architecture in LNCaP cells, the combination of both agents had an intermediate effect. PC-SPES inhibited tubulin polymerization in vitro, even in the presence of paclitaxel. Compared with tumors in control mice (mean tumor volume = 2983 mm(3), 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2380 to 3586 mm(3)), tumors were statistically significantly smaller in mice that received PC-SPES (mean tumor volume = 2018 mm(3), 95% CI = 1450 to 2568 mm(3); P =.028), paclitaxel (mean tumor volume = 1340 mm(3), 95% CI = 697 to 1983 mm(3); P<.001), or the combination of PC-SPES and paclitaxel (mean tumor volume = 1955 mm(3), 95% CI = 1260 to 2650 mm(3); P =.034). CONCLUSION: PC-SPES may interfere with microtubule polymerization. This activity has implications for the clinical management of patients with advanced prostate cancer who may be taking PC-SPES concurrently with microtubule-modulating chemotherapeutic agents, such as paclitaxel.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]