These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Anti-leprosy protective vaccination of rhesus monkeys with BCG or BCG plus heat-killed Mycobacterium leprae: lepromin skin test results.
    Author: Gormus BJ, Baskin GB, Xu K, Ratterree MS, Mack PA, Bohm RP, Meyers WM, Walsh GP.
    Journal: Lepr Rev; 2002 Sep; 73(3):254-61. PubMed ID: 12449891.
    Abstract:
    Groups of rhesus monkeys (RM) were vaccinated and boosted with living Mycobacterium bovis Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) or BCG + low dose (LD) heat-killed Mycobacterium leprae (HKML) or high dose (HD) HKML or were unvaccinated. Animals vaccinated with BCG + LD and HD HKML were lepromin skin tested 2 weeks after boosting. All groups were lepromin tested 37 and 46 months after challenge with live M. leprae. Fernandez (72 h) and Mitsuda (28 day) responses were recorded. Ten of 10 rhesus monkeys in each of the two BCG + HKML-vaccinated groups significantly converted to strong positive Fernandez status within 2 weeks of boosting, compared to one of six positives in the unvaccinated unchallenged normal control group. Both BCG + HKML groups were significantly protected from clinical leprosy. Six of 10 in each of the two BCG + HKML groups significantly converted to Mitsuda positivity within 2 weeks of boosting compared to zero of six in the normal control group. The sizes of the Mitsuda responses were larger in the LD group than the HD HKML vaccinated/boosted group, suggesting suppression by vaccination with higher doses of HKML in combination with BCG. Fernandez responses were negative in normal RM as well as in the unvaccinated, ML-challenged group and the BCG-vaccinated, ML-challenged group at 37 or 46 months after ML inoculation, although the BCG-vaccinated group was significantly protected from leprosy and the unvaccinated group was not. In contrast, at 37 months the Fernandez reaction was positive in the BCG plus LD and the BCG plus HD HKML-vaccinated groups, both of which were significantly protected from clinical leprosy. By 46 months, the Fernandez responses were below significance in all groups. Thus, Fernandez reactivity is not a reliable correlate to protection from experimental leprosy in RM. Mitsuda responses became strongly positive in all four ML-challenged groups by 37 months and remained strongly positive at 46 months after ML inoculation, suggesting that strong Mitsuda reactivity reflects responses to living ML. BCG or BCG + LD or HD HKML vaccination/boosting of RM produced significant clinical protection from leprosy and there was a good correlation between protection from LL forms of leprosy and positive Mitsuda skin test responses after challenge with live ML. Positive Mitsuda responses were generated in essentially all individuals after challenge with live ML, and this response was primed by prior vaccination/boosting with BCG + HKML as shown by conversion to positivity 2 weeks after boosting. The data show that resistance to clinical leprosy is reflected by Mitsuda responses in ML-exposed RM, similar to results from human studies, and confirm the suitability of RM as a model for leprosy vaccine studies.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]