These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparative measurements of total body water in healthy volunteers by online breath deuterium measurement and other near-subject methods.
    Author: Smith D, Engel B, Diskin AM, Spanel P, Davies SJ.
    Journal: Am J Clin Nutr; 2002 Dec; 76(6):1295-301. PubMed ID: 12450896.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: We developed a new near-subject approach, using flowing afterglow-mass spectrometry (FA-MS) and deuterium dilution, which enables the immediate measurement of total body water (TBW) from single exhalations. OBJECTIVES: The objectives were to show the efficacy of the new FA-MS method in measuring TBW in healthy subjects and to compare these measurements with values derived from multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis, skinfold-thickness (SFT) measurements, and both recent and historical published regression equations. DESIGN: After baseline measurement of breath deuterium abundance, 24 healthy subjects ingested 0.3 g D(2)O/kg body wt. A second breath sample was taken after 3 h to measure the increase in deuterium, from which TBW was calculated. Bioelectrical impedance analysis was carried out with a multifrequency analyzer, and SFT was measured by a single trained observer. Methods were compared with the use of Pearson's correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analyses. RESULTS: TBW measures obtained by all methods were highly correlated (r = 0.95-0.98, P < 0.001), especially those between FA-MS, SFT measurement, and recent regression equations. The mean values obtained were within 2% of those published for age-matched control subjects and varied by 1-6% when all methods were compared. Systematic bias was greatest when FA-MS was compared with bioelectrical impedance analysis, which tended to underestimate TBW in smaller, female subjects. No bias related to subject size was observed in a comparison of FA-MS with SFT measurement or with more recent regression equations. CONCLUSIONS: FA-MS is a simple and effective new approach to TBW measurement in healthy subjects. The difficulty of using population-derived equations to estimate TBW in individual subjects is emphasized.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]