These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Analysis of the binding energies of testosterone, 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone, androstenedione and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate with an antitestosterone antibody.
    Author: Nordman N, Valjakka J, Peräkylä M.
    Journal: Proteins; 2003 Jan 01; 50(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 12471606.
    Abstract:
    Molecular dynamics simulations and molecular mechanics-Poisson-Boltzmann surface area (MM-PBSA) free energy calculations were used to study the binding of testosterone (TES), 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone (5ADHT), androstenedione (AND), and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEAS) to the monoclonal antitestosterone antibody 3-C(4)F(5). The relative binding free energy of TES and AND was also calculated with free energy perturbation (FEP) simulations. The antibody 3-C(4)F(5) has a relatively high affinity (3 x 10(8) M(-1)) and on overall good binding profile for testosterone but its cross-reactivity with DHEAS has been the main reason for the failure to use this antibody in clinical immunoassays. The relative binding free energies obtained with the MM-PBSA method were 1.5 kcal/mol for 5ADHT, 3.8 kcal/mol for AND, and 4.3 kcal/mol for DHEAS, as compared to TES. When a water molecule of the ligand binding site, observed in the antibody-TES crystal structure, was explicitly included in MM-PBSA calculations, the relative binding energies were 3.4, 4.9, and 5.4 kcal/mol for 5ADHT, AND, and DHEAS, respectively. The calculated numbers are in correct order but larger than the corresponding experimental energies of 1.3, 1.5, and 2.6 kcal/mol, respectively. The fact that the MM-PBSA method reproduced the relative binding free energies of DHEAS, a steroid having a negatively charged sulfate group, and the neutrally charged TES, 5ADHT, and AND in satisfactory agreement with experiment shows the robustness of the method in predicting relative binding affinities. The 800-ps FEP simulations predicted that the antibody 3-C(4)F(5) binds TES 1.3 kcal/mol tighter than AND. Computational mutagenesis of selected amino acid residues of the ligand binding site revealed that the lower affinities of AND and DHEAS as compared to TES are due to a combined effect of several residues, each contributing a small fraction to the tighter binding of TES. An exception to this is Tyr99H, whose mutation to Ala lowered the binding of DHEAS 0.7 kcal/mol more than the binding of TES. This is probably due to the hydrogen bonding interaction formed between the OH group of Tyr99H and the sulfate group of DHEAS. Computational mutagensis data also showed that the affinity of the steroids to the antitestosterone antibody 3-C(4)F(5) would be enhanced if Trp47H were repositioned so that it would make more extensive contacts with the bound ligands. In addition, the binding of steroids to antitestosterone, antiprogesterone, and antiestradiol antibodies is discussed.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]