These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Mutational analysis of the Chlamydia trachomatis dnaK promoter defines the optimal -35 promoter element.
    Author: Schaumburg CS, Tan M.
    Journal: Nucleic Acids Res; 2003 Jan 15; 31(2):551-5. PubMed ID: 12527761.
    Abstract:
    A long-standing question in the biology of the intracellular bacterium, Chlamydia, has been the structure of the promoter recognized by its RNA polymerase. The 'RNA polymerase sigma subunit paradox' refers to the difficulty reconciling the conservation between the RNA polymerases of Chlamydia and Escherichia coli, especially at the level of the promoter-recognition sigma subunit, with the general lack of homology between chlamydial promoters and the E.coli sigma(70) consensus promoter. While the -10 promoter element appears to be conserved between Chlamydia and E.coli, the structure of the chlamydial -35 promoter element has not been defined. We have investigated the structure of the -35 element of the Chlamydia trachomatis dnaK promoter by measuring the effects of single base pair substitutions on in vitro promoter activity. Most substitutions produced large decreases in promoter activity, which allowed us to define the optimal -35 sequence in the context of the dnaK promoter. We found that the optimal chlamydial -35 promoter sequence is identical to the E.coli sigma(70) consensus -35 promoter element (TTGACA). These results indicate that the optimal promoter specificities of the major form of chlamydial RNA polymerase and E.coli sigma(70) RNA polymerase are in fact highly conserved. A further implication of our results is that many chlamydial promoters have a suboptimal promoter structure. We hypothesize that these chlamydial promoters are intrinsically weak promoters that can be regulated during the chlamydial developmental cycle by additional transcription factors.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]