These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A comparison of two time-domain analysis procedures in the determination of .VO(2) kinetics by pseudorandom binary sequence exercise testing.
    Author: Edwards AM, Claxton DB, Fysh ML.
    Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol; 2003 Jan; 88(4-5):411-6. PubMed ID: 12527971.
    Abstract:
    The purpose of this study was to apply and compare two time-domain analysis procedures in the determination of oxygen uptake (.VO(2)) kinetics in response to a pseudorandom binary sequence (PRBS) exercise test. PRBS exercise tests have typically been analysed in the frequency domain. However, the complex interpretation of frequency responses may have limited the application of this procedure in both sporting and clinical contexts, where a single time measurement would facilitate subject comparison. The relative potential of both a mean response time (MRT) and a peak cross-correlation time (PCCT) was investigated. This study was divided into two parts: a test-retest reliability study (part A), in which 10 healthy male subjects completed two identical PRBS exercise tests, and a comparison of the .VO(2) kinetics of 12 elite endurance runners (ER) and 12 elite sprinters (SR; part B). In part A, 95% limits of agreement were calculated for comparison between MRT and PCCT. The results of part A showed no significant difference between test and retest as assessed by MRT [mean (SD) 42.2 (4.2) s and 43.8 (6.9) s] or by PCCT [21.8 (3.7) s and 22.7 (4.5) s]. Measurement error (%) was lower for MRT in comparison with PCCT (16% and 25%, respectively). In part B of the study, the .VO(2) kinetics of ER were significantly faster than those of SR, as assessed by MRT [33.4 (3.4) s and 39.9 (7.1) s, respectively; P<0.01] and PCCT [20.9 (3.8) s and 24.8 (4.5) s; P<0.05]. It is possible that either analysis procedure could provide a single test measurement of .VO(2) kinetics; however, the greater reliability of the MRT data suggests that this method has more potential for development in the assessment of .VO(2) kinetics by PRBS exercise testing.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]