These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Experimental study on the biomechanical stability of different internal fixators for use in the mandible].
    Author: Piffkò J, Homann Ch, Schuon R, Joos U, Meyer U.
    Journal: Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2003 Jan; 7(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 12556978.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Comparative studies of different forms of osteosynthesis require that biomechanical and biological criteria be observed. The conditions in experimental studies should be as close as possible to the in vivo situation. The aim of our study was to develop a fracture model that would allow determination of the micromovements in the gap tissue following different forms of internal fixation in fractured human mandibles. METHODS: Micromovements in the gap tissue of five human mandibles treated with different osteosynthetic systems (DCP, EDCP, Miniplates, 3-D systems) following osteotomy or fracture in the region of the corpus and median region were investigated by means of strain gauges. By fitting the human mandibles in plaster according to a method of our own it was possible to create fractures at predictable and comparable localizations. RESULTS: Our investigations show that the micromovements in the gap tissue of osteotomied and fractured mandibles are different and not dependent on the form of osteosynthesis applied. Physiological micromovements in the gap tissue were found under strain for all osteosynthetic systems used in fractured and congruently reset mandibles. DISCUSSION: Our fracture and osteosynthesis model allows the quantitative determination of micromovements in the gap tissue and shows the importance of ideal realignment, which has a decisive influence on micromovements in the gap tissue.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]