These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The effect of aortic valve replacement on coronary flow reserve in patients with a normal coronary angiogram.
    Author: Nemes A, Forster T, Kovács Z, Thury A, Ungi I, Csanády M.
    Journal: Herz; 2002 Dec; 27(8):780-4. PubMed ID: 12574896.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: In patients with aortic stenosis and a normal coronary angiogram, a coronary flow reserve (CFR) is impaired. The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of aortic valve replacement (AVR) on the CFR after a long-term follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 30 patients with aortic stenosis and a normal coronary angiogram were enrolled in the study. CFR measurements were made on 21 patients 123 +/- 137 days before and 497 +/- 167 days after AVR. CFR measurements were carried out according to a standard protocol, with a vasodilator stimulus dipyridamole (0.56 mg/kg for 4 min) and peak diastolic velocity measurements at 6 min. RESULTS: Initially, the average peak gradient of aortic stenosis was 89.5 +/- 22.4 mm Hg. After AVR, it decreased to 26.2 +/- 9 mm Hg. Left ventricular mass was significantly lower after AVR: 354.9 +/- 107.9 g versus 223.8 +/- 73.6 g (p < 0.001). The average baseline diastolic velocity measured by pulsed Doppler in the left anterior descending coronary artery amounted to 62.2 +/- 25.5 cm/s before and 40.1 +/- 13.6 cm/s after AVR. The difference was statistically significant (p < 0.01). The average diastolic velocity at maximum stress equaled 117 +/- 42.8 cm/s pre- and 91.5 +/- 34 cm/s postoperatively (p < 0.005). The calculated CFR before AVR amounted to 1.96 +/- 0.5 and increased to 2.37 +/- 0.8 postoperatively. The difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Prosthetic AVR is of considerable benefit concerning the CFR in patients with a normal coronary angiogram after a long-term follow-up.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]