These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Vacuum-assisted closure as a treatment modality for infections after cardiac surgery.
    Author: Luckraz H, Murphy F, Bryant S, Charman SC, Ritchie AJ.
    Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2003 Feb; 125(2):301-5. PubMed ID: 12579098.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: Wound infections after cardiac surgery carry high morbidity and mortality. A plethora of management strategies have been used to treat such infections. We assessed the impact of vacuum-assisted closure on the management of sternal wound infections in terms of wound healing, duration of vacuum-assisted closure, and cost of treatment. METHODS: Between November 1998 and June 2001, a total of 27 mediastinal infections were managed with vacuum-assisted closure. Group A (n = 14) had vacuum-assisted closure as the final treatment modality, whereas in group B (n = 13) vacuum-assisted closure was followed by either a myocutaneous flap (n = 8) or primary (n = 5) wound closure. The choice of additional treatment modality was based on wound size. RESULTS: In group A, 4 patients died and a satisfactorily healed scar was achieved in 64% of cases. Median durations of vacuum-assisted closure and hospital stay in group A were 13.5 days (interquartile range 8.8-32.2 days) and 20 days (interquartile range 16.7-25.2 days), respectively. Mortality was 7.7% in group B, with a treatment failure rate of 15%. Median duration of vacuum-assisted closure in group B was 8 days (interquartile range 5.5-18 days), and median hospital stay was 29 days (interquartile range 25.8-38.2 days). During the year before institution of vacuum-assisted closure, poststernotomy infection (n = 13) was managed with rewiring and closed irrigation system. Treatment during this year failed in 30.7% of cases (n = 4/13), and mortality was also 30.7%. The total cost (hospitalization and treatment) per patient for vacuum-assisted closure was 16,400 dollars, compared with 20,000 dollars for the closed irrigation system treatment. CONCLUSION: Vacuum-assisted closure, used alone or before other surgical treatment strategies, is an acceptable treatment modality for infections in cardiac surgery with reasonable morbidity, mortality, and cost.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]