These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Selected problems of ophthalmological certification in legal proceedings in labour court--own experience].
    Author: Sobecki R.
    Journal: Klin Oczna; 2002; 104(3-4):295-8. PubMed ID: 12608323.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: Analysis of the appeals to the Appeals Labour Court and estimation of visual functions shown in court's decree. MATERIAL AND METHOD: 248 ophthalmic court's decree were analysed. RESULTS: In 72% of cases people were qualify as able to work. The most frequent reasons to obtain judgement of disability for labour were: eye injury, high myopia, strabismus, amblyopia, optical nerve atrophy, cataract. 54% persons were monocular. CONCLUSIONS: The most appeals to the Appeals Labour Court had no sufficient grounds for stating liability for labour.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]